Kayleigh McEnany completely Roasts Nancy Pelsoi at the Daily White House Press Briefing

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

A fly on the wall

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Nancy Pelosi & the Nose

Nancy Pelosi #TheResistance #BlueWave🌊 pic.twitter.com/Y6MTd03lZr

— Beverly Hills Antifa (@BevHillsAntifa7) May 20, 2018

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Pakistani Man of Mystery: The Spy Who Shagged US

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Ex-Black Caucus chair backs Pelosi challenger

Rep. Tim Ryan (D-Ohio) secured a significant endorsement on Wednesday in his bid to challenge House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) in a former chairwoman of the Congressional Black Caucus.

In a statement, Democratic Rep. Marcia Fudge said her fellow Ohioan offered what she believes is a necessary change after another disappointing election cycle for House Democrats.

Pelosi had predicted double-digit gains to cut into the House GOP majority in 2016, but Democrats have only netted six seats.

http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/house/307451-ex-black-caucus-chair-backs-pelosi-challenger

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

DCCC DOCS FROM PELOSI’S PC

Hi everyone
As you see I’ve been gradually posting DCCC docs on different states.
But besides that I have a folder from the Nancy Pelosi’s PC and I’d like to share some docs from it with you. They are related to immigration, Hispanics, BLM, Islam and other issues.
So here they are

https://guccifer2.wordpress.com/2016/08/31/pelosi/

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Nancy Pelosi Just Dropped Presidential Campaign Bombshell, Comes Out Against Superdelegates

If you listen carefully, you’ll hear the whisper of a butterfly waving its wings in China, and the thundering crash of the House of Clinton collapsing. Seriously.

Read more at http://www.inquisitr.com/2852213/nancy-pelosi-just-dropped-presidential-campaign-bombshell/#3p8Db2KFeck0MVBF.99

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Pelosi pans superdelegate system

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) on Thursday amplified her criticism of the Democrats' presidential primary system, saying the states' pledged delegates — and not the superdelegates — should decide the winner.

http://thehill.com/homenews/house/271651-pelosi-pans-superdelegate-system


Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Reports revive debate over congressional stock deals [Video]

The news program "60 Minutes" and Newsweek magazine made a big deal over the weekend of claims that former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and current Speaker John A. Boehnermay have benefited financially from trading stocks on insider information.

The reports, which have been picked up by news organizations around the country, suggest that many members of Congress may be getting rich trading on information available exclusively to lawmakers.

The specific allegations have been rejected completely by Pelosi, Boehner and other members who were cited in the reports. And some longtime Congress-watchers think the current debate fails to acknowledge the reason why members of Congress -- unlike, say, a judge or a Defense Departmentprocurement officer -- are allowed to trade freely in stocks.

The weekend news stories grew out of a book that will be released Tuesday "Throw Them All Out," which addresses the broader issue of officials getting rich through public service. The author, Peter Schweizer, a fellow at the conservative Hoover Institution, calls for an end to the "double standard" that allows members of Congress to engage in insider trading but prohibits a corporate executive from doing the same.  

Here's a quick summary of the most high-profile trading allegations made over the weekend: Paul Pelosi, husband of the then-speaker, bought more than $1 million worth of Visa stock in March 2008 through an initial public offering. TheHouse Judiciary Committee passed a bill later that year that addressed “swipe fees,” the charges assessed by credit-card companies on their debit cards. "60 Minutes" correspondent Steve Kroft asked Pelosi whether she used her power as speaker from blocking that legislation from getting to the floor, a move that presumably could have contributed to the stock's profitability.

Pelosi's allies rejected the report Sunday and today. Her spokesman, Drew Hammill, pointed out that the "60 Minutes" account “failed to note that the legislation . . . was reported out of the Judiciary Committee on Oct. 3, 2008 – the day the House was consumed in passing TARP and also the last day the House was in session before the November election." A separate statement from the chairman of the Judiciary Committee, John Conyers, said there was never any expectation that the bill would get to the floor -- and he applauded Pelosi's role in pushing consumer protection legislation to protect  credit card holders.

The "60 Minutes" and Newsweek stories also cited Schweizer's finding that Boehner was trading in healthcare stocks shortly before significant changes were made in the healthcare bill then moving through the House. 

“I have not made any decisions on day-to-day trading activities of my account and haven’t for years. I do not do it, haven’t done it and wouldn’t do it,” Boehner said during a Washington press conference earlier this month when Kroft asked about the transactions.

In an interview, Schweizer said he could not say with any certainty whether specific members gained improperly. "My objection was to a double standard whereby the permanent political class gets to play by different rules than the rest of us. Most of us have to abide by insider trading laws and most of us in our employment have to abide by conflict of interest rules."

The report will likely add fuel to a growing debate about whether to restrict congressional stock trading or to require more rigorous disclosure. There is conflicting evidence on the topic. An academic  study released earlier  this year found members receiving unusually high returns from the stock portfolios.

But another study found just the opposite. Much of the ongoing debate is summarized in the current issue of the Atlantic Monthly, in an article by editor Megan McArdle.

Stan Brand, a former House counsel who advises members of Congress on ethics matters, urges calm. There may be a need for reform, but more facts are needed. He says Congress members are explicitly permitted to trade stock -- for a reason.

"The current rules state that every member has an affirmative duty to vote on a given legislative matter, unless they have a direct pecuniary interest" that could be affected directly by the vote. "A stock trade has never been considered pecuniary" because Congress members are part of a very large voting bloc and one member has only limited ability to influence a legislative outcome.

So, in the 1970s,congressional ethics panels allowed members holding New York City bonds to vote on a bailout for the city. The same was true for members who held shares in Chrysler before the auto bailout. If members of Congress -- who were intended to be citizen legislators with private personal and business interests -- had to recuse themselves for every stock they owned, it might be difficult to get a quorum on key votes, Brand said.

In his book, Schweizer goes beyond stocks to discuss how members of Congress made gains in property deals connected to transportation earmarks that they sponsored. Recently reformed lobbyistJack Abramoff said he heard a lot about stock trading from members of Congress.

But even his anecdotes suggested there are bigger, more sinister problems stirring in Washington's ethical swamp -- notably the influence of highly paid lobbyists and a Washington career path that promises stratospheric salaries to members of Congress and staffers after public service.

In an interview last week with CNBC, Abramoff recalled members of Congress bragging about their stock trades. "It was more, 'Look at me, I'm a real great stock trader,'" Abramoff said. "I was making far more money than they were. So I wasn't as impressed as perhaps they thought I'd be."

Nancy Pelosi Wants To Know How Much It's Going To Cost Her SF Gays To Defend DOMA

Nancy Pelosi Wants To Know How Much It's Going To Cost Her SF Gays To Defend DOMA

Fallen former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is barely on a smile-and-nod relationship with her Republican replacement John Boehner, and this little matter of him moving to have the House defend the Defense of Marriage Act is just one puddle she's going to splash around in. Not only does Pelosi side with Obama on DOMA, but she sees it as a waste of cash to litigate the growing number of DOMA-related lawsuits -- so she's kindly asked Boehner to let her know how much all this is going to cost taxpayers. You know, like the homosexual ones in San Francisco she represents, who are about to see a token percentage of their federal income taxes (already made discriminatory because of DOMA) be used to defend the law.

Thanks For The Memories Pelosi

Michelle Bachman attacks Nancy Pelosi in letter mailing campaign

Email

Written by therealnews on Sep-10-10 6:22am2010-09-10T03:22:51

From:  welcometoafreeworld.blogspot.com

I received a letter in the mail from Michele Bachmann a few days ago and would like to share it with you. The letter speaks for itself so here you go!

Letter:
Nancy Pelosi and Barack Obama are challenging the very foundations of our constitution, our democracy, our freedoms and our economy. Every where you turn, you'll find that the common sense, conservative ideals which made America the greatest nation on the face of the earth are under a withering assault. Whether it's the democrats in Washington, mega-media moguls in New York, the red carpet crowd in Hollywood, or big labor union leaders, greedy trial lawyers, militant pro-abortionists and environmental extremist.

Under speaker Pelosi's leadership, they roam the halls of the capitol as if they own the place. It makes me sad when I think of all the horrible legislation Nancy Pelosi has rammed through the house of representatives. I've never been afraid to speak out about what speaker Pelosi's policies are doing to destroy America's prosperities and freedoms.

My blunt criticism of the speaker and her extreme liberal agenda has painted a giant red bull's-eye on my back as one of her top targets for defeat this November. But she's not trying to bring me down simply to squelch criticism of her iron-fisted leadership and her San Francisco-left wing agenda. For her, this is more personal.

With a republican tidal wave about to sweep across the Potomac and sweep dozens of democratic incumbents out of office, Nancy Pelosi's only chance to keep her iron grip on power is to direct millions of liberal special interest dollars against republican incumbents in competitive districts across America.

It just so happens that I am honored to serve one of those districts.

Two years of speaker Pelosi under a republican president was bad enough. It will take years to clean up the mess left behind by two more years of Nancy Pelosi and Barack Obama in the white house. They've spent billions we don't have on programs we don't need. Their "stimulus" plan to jump-start our economy tripled our national debt and caused hundreds of thousands of people to lose their jobs. They've rammed through a horrible Obamacare bill that nationalizes one-sixth of our economy, creates a massive new government bureaucracy and rations the care you are eligible to receive.

They've bailed out failing car makers, insurance companies and giant wall street banks, but raised taxes and added crippling legislation that hurts main street businesses. They've set their sights on your second amendment rights to own a gun, and at the behest of radical feminist groups your tax dollars will soon be used to end the lives of precious unborn children.

That's just what they've done so far.

Next on their agenda is a national energy tax, based on junk science, that will cost your family thousands of dollars each year and kill tens of thousands of jobs. They're preparing to ram through card-check legslation- written by big labor bosses- that will take away the right of workers to cast secret ballots in union elections.

Pelosi and her fellow liberal democrats are working to turn the entire nation into one big "sanctuary city" like her hometown of San Francisco. (where millions of undocumented illegal immigrants aren't asked for identification, but instead welcomed with open arms, eventually granted amnesty and ultimately granted citizenship!)

Guess who's paying for it all? You are!
And your about to pay more. A lot more.

That's because Pelosi and Obama plan to let the Bush tax cuts of 2001 2003 expire at the end of this year. So, beginning in 2011 the average family of four will pay an additional $2,200 in income taxes. I could probably fill another ten pages of terrible legislation that speaker Nancy Pelosi has guided through the house of representatives in the past few years.

But the fact is that I'm in the middle of the toughest re-election fight of my life.

If Nancy Pelosi is successful in defeating me, she'll most likely have the votes to serve another term as speaker. And if that's the case, I fear that America may never recover from the harm that she and Barack Obama can do with two more years of complete and total unchecked power!

I believe in less government, lower taxes and more freedom. And as I've said many times before, I'd rather risk my seat in congress than retreat from those ideals simply to placate the radical wishes of an angry, well-funded liberal mob.

Will you help me win my re-election campaign, and deny speaker Pelosi another term as speaker, and stop them? Yours truly, Michelle Bachmann.

end of letter:

Bachmann describes a "gangster government"