Thursday, November 4, 2010

Michele Bachmann bid adds drama to the GOP leadership race


Michele Bachmann bid adds drama to the GOP leadership race

Minnesota 6th District Congressional incumbent Republican Michele Bachmann preps for a television interview, Tuesday, Nov. 2, 2010, in Bloomington, Minn. | AP Photo
Michele Bachmann is making a play for the Republican Conference chairmanship. | AP PhotoClose
House Republicans look like they’ve largely been spared any uncomfortable leadership races as they cruise into their robust new majority, except for one little speed bump: Michele Bachmann.
The often fiery and always unpredictable Bachmann, a tea party favorite, is trying to make a contest out of the battle for the Republican Conference chairmanship, a job that is critical for setting the party’s message and is seen as a steppingstone to higher leadership positions.

Text Size

  • -
  • +
  • reset

Bachmann with Matthews

The favorite is Rep. Jeb Hensarling of Texas, and top Republicans are making it clear that he is the insider’s choice. Minority Whip Eric Cantor of Virginia and outgoing Conference Chairman Mike Pence of Indiana already have endorsed Hensarling, sending a clear message that if Bachmann wants the job, she’s going to have to run an insurgent race for it.
The rest of the Republican leadership races should go down smoothly: House Minority Leader John Boehner of Ohio for speaker and Cantor for majority leader. And so far, California Rep. Kevin McCarthy is the only candidate who has announced his intention to run for whip.
On the losing Democratic side of the House, the big question is whether Speaker Nancy Pelosi would step aside as the top Democrat. The California representative’s departure, while expected but not guaranteed, would likely clear the way for Majority Leader Steny Hoyer. The Maryland Democrat is the heavy favorite to become minority leader in the 112th Congress.
Bachmann has been known to do things on her own on the Republican side. She started the Tea Party Caucus and is going to make the case that it’s important that a “constitutional conservative” is at the leadership table, her spokesman Sergio Gor said.
Constitutional conservatives “need a loud and clear voice within the GOP conference, and that’s why Michele Bachmann is running,” Gor said Wednesday. He declined to detail Bachmann’s campaign strategy. He even noted that Bachmann is not running a campaign against Hensarling, who is the only other candidate.
Boehner is staying out of the race so far.
Hensarling will argue that he’s the true conservative. Citizens Against Government Waste, a spending watchdog group, rates him higher than Bachmann. The group gives him a lifetime rating of 96 to her 91. Club for Growth gives Bachmann an 88, compared with Hensarling, who is tied for No. 1 with the top score of 100.


Read more: 
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1110/44685.html#ixzz14KVIsR4Y

Bachmann running for leadership position in House Republican caucus

Bachmann running for leadership position in House Republican caucus


POSTED AT 2:15 PM ON NOVEMBER 3, 2010 BY ED MORRISSEY
PRINTER-FRIENDLY

It didn’t take long for the Tea Party to make itself felt in the Republican Party leadership after delivering a historic victory in the midterms.  Just hours after taking at least 61 seats in the House, and immediately after Mike Pence withdrew from the position of Conference Chair, Big Government reports that one of the leading lights of the Tea Party movement has thrown her hat into the ring for the #4 position in House Republican leadership:
If the GOP is to capitalize on its success, it needs to incorporate the energy and commitment to principle displayed by the grass roots activists. It needs to realize that the game has really changed and the politics of the past two decades are over. Big Government has now learned that Rep. Michele Bachmann, one of the first GOP office-holders to recognize the importance of the tea party uprising, will enter the race for GOP Conference Chair.
The number 4 position in House Leadership, the Conference Chair is well-positioned to inject grass-roots energy into the majority caucus. It is energy the DC GOP establishment desperately needs. Without it, last night’s historic win will be only a blip on the political landscape.
Rep. Bachmann is, in many ways, one of the leaders of the ‘tea party’ in Congress. Incoming GOP members would be well-served to have one of their own in leadership. God speed, Rep. Bachmann.
This would not be Bachmann’s first attempt to get the Tea Party a seat at the table for direction of Congress.  She created the Tea Party Caucus in order to show strength on policy as well as demonstrate the GOP’s ability to address the concerns of grassroots activists.
There will undoubtedly be other candidates for this position, but John Boehner and his caucus will have to find a way to give Tea Party leaders in their midst some representation in leadership.  Bachmann is the most visible Tea Party leadership in the House, second nationally only to Sarah Palin in terms of visibility.  If the GOP doesn’t find a leadership role for Bachmann somewhere, they’re going to have to put someone of equal stature to the grassroots activists in her place, and I’m not sure that anyone else will fit the bill.
One more point should be made about the longer-term impact of this decision for Bachmann’s future in the House.  She won her district handily against a flood of money for her challenger Tarryl Clark, beating her by 13 points and putting an exclamation point on her grip on the district.  If the caucus denies her a leadership position, Bachmann may be tempted to run for the Senate against Amy Klobuchar in 2012, which would be a tough sell statewide here; Democrats swept the statewide elections this year with the possible exception of the gubernatorial race even in this GOP wave cycle.  A switch by Bachmann to the Senate race could easily put that House seat in jeopardy in 2012.  If they keep her in leadership, that provides her an incentive to stay in the House and protect the seat, which is something House Republicans may want to consider in their calculations.

Thanks For The Memories Pelosi

Tuesday, November 2, 2010

Christine O'Donnell concedes U.S. Senate race to Chris Coon

Photos

441-1-Christine O'Donnell.JPG
Antonio Prado

Republican U.S. Senate candidate Christine O'Donnell gives her concession speech Tuesday night in the Gold Ballroom of Dover Downs' Rollins Center.

Shortly after 9:30 p.m. Tuesday, Republican Christine O’Donnell took the stage in the Gold Ballroom of the Rollins Center at Dover Downs to concede the race for the U.S. Senate seat to Democrat Chris Coons.
Coons defeated O’Donnell with 56.6 percent of the vote, 172,590 to 122,237. Independent Party of Delaware candidate Glenn A. Miller and James W. Rash combined for 3.3 percent of the vote, according to unofficial results posted online by the Delaware Department of Elections.
It was the most votes O’Donnell has ever received in her third try for U.S. Senate.
But, in the end, she could not overcome the 110,000 advantage Democrats have in the Diamond State. Her message of smaller government, including making the Bush tax cuts permanent so that small businesses would have more money in their pockets to hire people, did not resonate with enough voters. Neither did campaign ads hammering Coons for increasing taxes 54 percent during his six years in office, years that saw the real estate transfer tax dry up.
O’Donnell told hundreds of supporters that her campaign was still a victory in that her supporters changed the electoral process in Delaware forever.
“The Delaware Democratic system will never be the same,” O’Donnell told a cheering crowd of about 300. “The Republican Party will never be the same. Our voice was heard, and we will never be silenced.
“We will continue to be heard,” she said. “God bless you.”
She had just gotten off the telephone with Coons, she told the crowd during her concession speech. She reminded him to think about small business owners like Victor Rodriguez – a longstanding grocer in the traditional Hispanic enclave of Hilltop in the city of Wilmington’s Westside. Namely, she urged him to not cast a vote for a tax increase that small business owners said would cause some of them to close their doors. And she urged him to fight the death tax that she also said would hurt small business owners.
But O’Donnell believes her supporters will continue to be vigilant in keeping a watchful eye on Washington, D.C., which she continually criticized for irresponsible spending that has the nation trillions of dollars in debt to China.

Indeed, O’Donnell’s campaign taught the Republican Party of Delaware – the hard way – that the people pick their candidate, not party bosses, when she upset U.S. Rep. Mike Castle in the September primary.
The Tea Party Express-backed candidate also saw about $5 million pour into her campaign, most of it from out-of-state.
A steady stream of Delawareans headed to the polls after seeing the U.S. Senate race between O’Donnell and Coons thrust into the First State into the national and international spotlight as well as the high-profile race for the U.S. House of Representatives race between Democrat John Carney and Republican Glen Urquhart.
Indeed, those two races attracted most voters to this off-year election.
And it was a mixed bag in terms of who voted for whom.
Some Democrats and Republicans voted along party lines, respectively. Some Republicans voted for the Democrats in the two top races. Some Democrats voted for both Republicans in the high profile races. Some people split their vote.
Republican Bob Russell, 59 of Hockessin, voted for Coons and John Carney, the Democrat in the race for Delaware’s lone seat in the U.S. House of Representatives, at the Hockessin PAL Center. Russell, a Castle supporter, did not want to vote for O’Donnell because she’s “never really had a job,” he said. As for the U.S. House race, he went for the Democrat because of the social issues that people fought for like health care reform and Roe v. Wade.
Democrat Ken Brick, 51 of Brandywine Hundred, voted for Coons and Carney at Brandywine High School.
“I think [Coons] is far more qualified,” Brick said. “I also know him personally. I know his children. He is much more of an inclusive person. He’s more of a healer. He’s more pragmatic. My sense is that Christine O’Donnell is reactionary, fear-based and will cause a lot of separation.”
Democrat Barbara Volko, 48, of Greenville, with her daughter Jameson, 9, voted for Coons because he’s more educated and capable of doing the job and Carney because she has heard him speak before and likes his stance on environmental issues.
Republican Marilyn Flaherty, 86, of Greenville, voted for Republicans, including O’Donnell and Urquhart, at Alexis I. duPont High School because she is unhappy with the Obama administration and wants more checks and balances in Washington, D.C.
Also at A.I. High, Republican Samuel Hobbs, 45, of Greenville, voted for O'Donnell and Urquhart because he's concerned with taxes going up as a businessman.
“I live on a farm here in Greenville, Delaware and there are farmers up and down the state that are under pressure because of the estate tax,’ Hobbs said. “One gentleman Christine O’Donnell talks about has been farming the same farm since the 1800s. All they want to do is just farm their land. People around them have sold their farms for beach houses. His property may be worth $5 million or $6 million and they don’t have money to pay [those] taxes. So, they’re going to have to sell their farm. Instead he wants to die because he knows that he can pass that family farm on and that’s an absolute travesty. Our government should never be putting people in that position, especially here in the state of Delaware. We only have so much green space.”
Republican Jeffrey Watt, 49, of Hockessin, brought his sons Matthew, left, and Joshua, right – students at Brandywine Springs – to the Hockessin PAL Center where Watt voted for O’Donnell and Urquhart. Watt, a Mike Castle supporter, said he sort of held his nose when he voted for O’Donnell because he did not like the outside influences on Delaware. However, he found Urquhart was in the conservative mode that Watt follows.
However, Republican Bob Kissell, 68, of Greenville, went across party lines and voted for Coons and Carney.
“I just couldn’t bring myself to vote for Christine O’Donnell,” Kissell said. “She’s unqualified. A lot in that message has appeal, but there’s a whole lot more to that job than just saying less government. It was tough on the House side because Urquhart seems to have some intelligence and ideas.”
Democrat Barbara Volko, 48, of Greenville, with her daughter Jameson, 9, voted for Coons because he’s more educated and capable of doing the job and Carney because she has heard him speak before and likes his stance on environmental issues. 

Harry Reid hanging on to lead over Sharron Angle


Harry Reid hanging on to lead over Sharron Angle

Image
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid addresses volunteers on the afternoon of Tuesday, Nov. 2, 2010, at campaign headquarters on Valley View Boulevard.
Published Tuesday, Nov. 2, 2010 | 8:40 p.m.
Updated 3 minutes ago
Click to enlarge photo
Nevada Republican Senate candidate Sharron Angle speaks to supporters at the Peppermill Hotel/Casino in Reno on Tuesday, Nov. 2, 2010.
When the numbers flashed up on the television screen that Reid was leading with 52 percent of the vote to Sharron Angle's 43, the convention center ballroom exploded into applause -- which turned into yelps and cheers as party attendees realized that 52 percent of precincts were reporting -- a sharp jump in significance from the numbers that flashed up only 10 minutes earlier, showing a narrower, 8 percent lead with just 1 percent of the precincts reporting.
"That's good," said press secretary Phoebe Sweet as she watched and digested the numbers. "That's good. And we're up in Washoe county too."
But Democrats are already cautiously celebrating the early voting totals.
After casting her vote in Reno, Angle said she was “cautiously optimistic” about her chances this evening. But she added, when prompted by a reporter, that her campaign is prepared for a recount if that becomes necessary.
“Whatever is necessary to do,” she said. “We have to be ready for any opportunity.”
In a reflection of the bitter destroy-the-opponent-at-all-costs ad war that characterized the Senate race, voters interviewed at polls across the state said they hated both of their choices.
Many Angle voters saw their ballot-choice as a protest of Reid’s policies, not an endorsement of Angle’s views.
“I’m not 100 percent Sharron Angle, but I am 100 percent against Harry Reid,” said Joseph Gomez, a Reno retiree who cast his vote for Angle.
Those who may have found some of her positions extreme, as Reid argued, said she wouldn’t be able to enact them anyway if she’s in the minority.
“It would take more than just her to end Social Security,” said 68-year-old Gail Gomez, a Reno Republican who voted for Angle. Similarly, Reid voters seemed more persuaded by the Democrat’s effort to cast his opponent as an extremist than his argument that Nevada could use his seniority.
“I voted for Reid reluctantly, because he’s a henchman for Obama,” said Lawrence Levine, a Las Vegas Democrat. “Nevada had a real problem with the two candidates on the ballot. Angle revealed that she’s no kind of leader.”
Reid’s turnout efforts focused strongly on the Hispanic community, a key swing demographic in Nevada elections. Early polling suggested Hispanics wouldn’t turn out because of frustration with the economy and a lack of movement on immigration reform.
A Republican operative even aired an ad explicitly telling Hispanics not to vote.
That, coupled with Angle’s inflammatory ads using images of Hispanic youth dressed as gang members drove some Hispanic voters to the polls.
“That was the final straw,” Gilberto Ramirez, a Reno concrete worker who recently obtained his citizenship and voted for the first time. “She was depicting me as a gang member. I served seven years in the Marine Corps.”
Other voters said Reid deserved more time to help fix the economy.
"Give Harry Reid and Obama a chance to fix it. It took them eight years to make this mess," said Selena Hamilton, a Las Vegas Democrat, referring to Bush and the Republicans. "And we're trying to get it cleaned up in just one year. And these Republicans in the Senate got to stop getting in the way."

Michele Bachmann Re-Elected in Minnesota's 6th District, Most Expensive Congressional Race


Michele Bachmann Re-Elected in Minnesota's 6th District, Most Expensive Congressional Race

Updated: Tuesday, 02 Nov 2010, 11:38 PM EDT
Published : Tuesday, 02 Nov 2010, 11:23 PM EDT
ST. PAUL, Minn. - Republican Rep. Michele Bachmann was re-elected in Minnesota's 6th congressional district, ending the nation's most expensive U.S. House race.
Bachmann, a Tea Party favorite, won a third term after raising more than $11 million and spending at least $8.8 million.
"This is step one in the turn-around project," said Bachmann after the results were announced. "There is a lot of work to do, but together we will take back and reclaim the greatness of this nation."
Her prodigious fundraising paid for months of negative TV ads painting Clark as a tax-and-spender. Clark raised more than $4 million of her own and got plenty of help from outside the district. But she fell short in her attempt to portray Bachmann as more concerned with her national prospects than with the people of the district.
Bachmann was bashed by several big names, like former president Bill Clinton and Garrison Keillor. Clinton said Bachmann makes former Republican Presidents Richard Nixon and George W. Bush look like liberals and student radicals. He also said great GOP presidents like Theodore Roosevelt and Dwight Eisenhower would vote for Clark.
In the final weeks before Election Day, Bachmann said she was not surprised the Democrats were bringing out some heavy hitters to campaign for Clark. Bachmann felt she was a high value target for Democrats.
The 6th is Minnesota's most conservative district, covering northern Twin Cities suburbs and the St. Cloud area.

Sarah Palin: GOP establishment 'sleazy'




Former Alaska GOP Gov. Sarah Palin says “sleazy” establishment Republicans are out to get her.

Following a POLITICO story reporting that top GOP operatives in Washington – some of whom support her 2012 rivals – are working to stall her momentum in hopes of crippling a potential presidential run, Palin went on Fox Business Network to attack the party establishment.

“Some within the establishment don’t like the fact that I won’t back down to a good old boys club,” Palin said. “A lot of this has to do with control, power, money.”
Palin complained about the consultant culture in Washington, arguing that party operatives are often working in their own best interest rather than doing what is best for the party.
“Establishment bosses and advisers that try to shape a candidate and get paid to shape that candidate,” Palin said. “It’s very sleazy.”
Several of Palin’s potential 2012 rivals jumped to her defense after the story published, including former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney and Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty.
Asked about Romney as a potential presidential candidate, Palin said the former governor would be “a fine candidate.”
“I didn’t vote for him in the [2008] primary,” she pointed out. “But Mitt Romney would be a good candidate. We have got some great candidates out there. Competition will breed success. We have to make sure in our party we don’t shy away from a competitive primary.”


Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1110/44550.html#ixzz148ReVKSi