Establishment Dems Fight to Defeat 'Medicare-for-All' in Colorado

Pro-Clinton Democrats join Big Pharma and state Republicans in fighting to defeat first-in-the-nation ballot measure for statewide single-payer plan

Highlighting the divisions in the Democratic party this election, Colorado's ballot measure for a universal, single-payer healthcare plan is facing unexpected resistance from the very same party that has been calling for such a healthcare plan since the 1990s.

"There is a disconnect between the powers that be and the people," said state senator Irene Aguilar, a former doctor and the chief architect of the statewide 'Medicare-for-all,' called ColoradoCare, in an interview with the Guardian. "The powers that be are incrementalists. There hasn't been a courage of conviction to try and deal with [healthcare coverage]."

If it passes, ColoradoCare would make Colorado the first state in the nation with universal healthcare.

http://www.commondreams.org/news/2016/05/20/establishment-dems-fight-defeat-medicare-all-colorado

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Dr. Cornel West calls out Democratic Platform Committee "nays" out for ignoring the rights of 29 million Americans without health insurance:

The Democratic Platform Committee REJECTED adding single payer to the party platform this week. 
Watch 

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Hillary Clinton Gets $13 Million From Health Industry, Now Says Single-Payer Will “Never, Ever Come To Pass­”

Closing out her Iowa campaign, Hillary Clinton on Friday declared that the Medicare-for-all proposal pushed by her Democratic primary opponent and many liberal groups will “never, ever come to pass.” The statement came weeks after a new poll showed most Americans support the idea. Her declaration was a reversal of her position two decades ago — which came before she received millions of dollars of campaign cash from the health industry.

http://bients.com/hillary-clinton-gets-13-million-health-industry-now-says-single-payer-will-never-ever-come-pass%C2%AD/

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

According to the U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Sebelius, 1 in 3 Americans participate in the nation's Single Payer programs: Medicaid, Medicare, TRICARE, SHIP, CHIP.

The companion component to Rep. Conyers' Single Payer Bill is the Single Audit, which has been effectively removed from all discussions on health care reform.

Until the societal benefits of improved quality and delivery of services are addressed, the burdens of fraud, waste and abuse will continue to weigh heavily upon those who pay private insurance.

Dems desire for government run health care exposed

Throughout the lopsided debate that preceded the passage of Obamacare, the Democrats made one thing perfectly clear: Obama's health care reforms were NOT a step on the way to a single-payer system.
The American people were told, repeatedly, that no one wanted government run medicine. Democrats were adamant that they were not interested in having a federal bureaucracy get between patients and their doctors. Even those Congressmen furthest left of center assured the public that a single-payer system was not the goal.

Yet, beneath the surface, there was an obvious ruse. Despite assurances that the cost of coverage would go down, it quickly became clear that the mandates contained within Obamacare would cause insurance rates to skyrocket. Critics claimed that the end result was clear. Corporations would drop their insurance benefits, insurers would go out of business, and the public would be trapped, paying 100 percent of their medical bills themselves. Since the cost of care will continue to increase, the government would be "forced" to step in and offer a single-payer, tax-based, solution. In short, Obama's reform bill was just the first step in a plan for a total health care takeover.

Monday morning, at a National Press Club newsmakers program, Conyers confirmed what many have argued all along.

"Had that bill failed," Conyers said, "it would have taken us another decade or longer to get single payer. We view the health care reform bill as a platform on which we are now able to move forward."

Later, when pressed by a reporter from CNS News, Conyers added "if we didn't have this, health care, universal health care, would be an even more difficult legislative objective."

Conyers has long been a supporter of a universal, government controlled, health care, and has proposed a number of bills designed to create such a system. His most recent attempt began three years ago, and was re-introduced this past February. Dubbed "The Improved and Expanded Medicare for All Act," H.R.676, would establish a 100 percent taxpayer funded, non-profit, single payer system.

In the bill, Conyers claims that "The time has come for deep systemic change in our health care system, and a large dose of common sense."

Perhaps he'll find that common sense among the bill's co-sponsors. Reading like a who's who of pro Universal Health care politicians, the list includes Barney Frank, who has already claimed that Obamacare would be a first step toward single payer, only to retract the statements when admitting how unpopular such a system would be. Other notables include Democrat Dennis Kucinich, who argued favorably that a Republican repeal of Obamacare would open the door to a massive single payer takeover, and Jesse Jackson Jr., who has argued that government run health care is a civil right which should be added to the Constitution.

In short, those who want single payer believe that Obamacare will lead to completely government run health care and they're laying the groundwork for the takeover. John Conyers has now admitted as much, and has authored the plan they hope to implement.

John Conyers Talks about Healthcare

Rep. John Conyers Admits ObamaCare A “Platform” For Single-Payer System…

Rep. John Conyers Admits ObamaCare A “Platform” For Single-Payer System…

March, 14, 2011 — nicedeb

Like we said all along – ( in part, because so many of the Dems, esp. Obama, were on record supporting single payer) – but Democrats always denied it. They lied to the American people because they didn’t think we could handle the truth.. . We rubes weren’t to be allowed to have that much information.

CNSNews.com) – Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich.), the ranking member of the House Judiciary Committee, told CNSNews.com today that the health-care law that President Barack Obama signed last March is a “platform” for a building single-payer health system in the U.S.

During a newsmakers program at the National Press Club on Monday, Conyers said that after discussing the issue with Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D.-Ohio) he voted for the health-care law because he saw it as a necessary “platform” for building toward a single-payer health-care system in the United States.

Watch video of Conyers’ comments at Weasel Zippers. Conyers notes: “Every industrialized nation on the planet has universal health care”. Sheesh people, get up to speed.

Apparently, we’re supposed to have forgotten already, how fervently they denied it.

Well, I certainly don’t. Because I called them out on the lies over and over and over again. And I’m still appalled and disgusted and outraged by their duplicity in the matter.  There would have been an even greater groundswell of disapproval, had they been honest about what they were doing.  But no. The Dems’ contempt for Americans had never before been so manifest.

Here is Obama during the election, trying to answer a tricky question about his consistency on the issue, since he had magically swerved towards the middle in the health care debate after he had decided to run for President. As you can see, there is no lie too preposterous for this man when his agenda is at risk:

He continued to lie throughout the Obamacare debate in 2009/2010…(although in fairness – so did all the Dem Socialists).

Here he is in his weekly address, August 21 2009, clearing up some of  the crazy misinformation that was going around:

We’ve all heard the charge that reform will somehow bring about a government takeover of health care. I know that sounds scary to many folks. It sounds scary to me, too.But here’s the thing: it’s not true. I no sooner want government to get between you and your doctor than I want insurance companies to make arbitrary decisions about what medical care is best for you, as they do today. As I’ve said from the beginning, under the reform we seek, if you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor. If you like your private health insurance plan, you can keep your plan. Period.

I went ahead and embedded the video so you could watch the Lyin’ King look into the camera and knowingly lie to the American people, (as is his habit). The White House launched a counter-attack on Republicans who were accusing ObamaCare of being a Trojan Horse for Single Payer.  Linda Douglas even set up a “snitch site”  for people to report the spreaders of “disinformation”, AKA (in Obamalingo): The truth.

See A Health Care Lie? Tell The White House.

Now Democrats feel bold enough to come out and say of course, Single Payer is the ultimate goal. Why would anyone have ever thought otherwise?

‘Single payer’ still their goal

Shortly after noon on Friday, state Rep. Michael Dembrow stepped to the microphone and addressed a crowd of about 150 people gathered on the steps of the Oregon Capitol in Salem.

“You look so healthy,” he told his audience. “You must all have good health insurance.”

The line got a big laugh for the Portland Democrat, as he must have known it would. Dembrow is the chief sponsor of House Bill 3510, the Affordable Health Care for All Oregon Act, which would all but eliminate private health insurance in Oregon and replace it with a taxpayer-funded system covering everyone in the state: single-payer health care.

Dembrow’s bill was scheduled for a hearing before the House Health Care Committee on Friday afternoon, and the lunchtime rally on the Capitol steps was a bit of political theater calculated to show support.

Toting signs with slogans such as “Patients Not Profits,” “Single Payer Now!” and “Everybody In, Nobody Out,” the crowd chanted and cheered for more than an hour as speaker after speaker slammed the insurance industry, shared horror stories of Americans bankrupted by medical expenses and called on the legislature to enact Dembrow’s proposal.

The really funny thing was, none of them seemed to think it has a ghost of a chance.

Rep. Jules Bailey, one of the bill’s co-sponsors, exhorted the crowd to settle in for a long fight.

“Don’t stop,” Bailey said. “If we don’t get there right away, we will get there eventually. We will get there.”

As Dembrow himself put it, “It’s not all about the bill. Single payer is a movement.”

“A long-term effort”

For hardcore health care reformers, single payer is the holy grail, a system that would rein in out-of-control medical costs while extending coverage to everyone. But they face determined and well-financed opposition from insurers, pharmaceutical companies and tea party Republicans, who deride the idea as socialized medicine.

HB 3510 is not the first attempt to create a single-payer health care system in Oregon. That distinction belongs to Senate Bill 1066, which was introduced in 1995 — and promptly faded into obscurity.

The issue was resuscitated in 2002, when Health Care for All-Oregon mounted a statewide signature-gathering campaign that succeeded in placing Measure 23 before the voters — who shot it down by a 700,000-vote margin.

Now it’s back, and while Dembrow has no illusions that his bill will pass, he’s crossing his fingers that it will stay alive long enough to generate some genuine discussion in the legislature. He has two co-sponsors on the Senate side, where he’s hoping the proposal could get additional hearings.

If he can get enough lawmakers interested in the concept, they might be willing to commission an in-depth cost analysis, a step that could build additional support. And even if 3510 dies this session, as expected, he’ll push to send it to Oregon voters again as a referendum, possibly in 2013.

“The likelihood of this bill passing and us having a single-payer system in the next year or two is remote,” Dembrow acknowledged in an interview last week.

“I see the effort for single payer as being a long-term effort,” he added. “There is still a lot of education that has to happen and a lot of organizing that has to happen, and this bill is a vehicle for that.”

Coalition-building

As health care costs continue to rise faster than American incomes, more and more people are flocking to the single-payer banner. In Oregon as in other states, the coalition that has formed around the issue includes labor unions, doctors and nurses, churches and social justice organizations, all of which were well represented at Friday’s rally in Salem.

Peter Shapiro was the master of ceremonies, introducing the speakers and setting the tone for the event with his rabble-rousing commentary.

A retired mailman who now works as an organizer for Portland Jobs With Justice, Shapiro urged the audience to fight back against the attacks on public employee unions around the country.

“I have one of those gold-plated plans,” he told the crowd. “I’m one of those people you’re supposed to hate. And 25 percent of my federal annuity goes to insurance premiums.”

In an interview, Shapiro talked about organized labor’s shift toward single payer after years of fighting to protect hard-won insurance benefits — often achieved at the cost of significant concessions on wages.

“It’s a difficult transition for union members to make. It’s a mark of how badly our health care system has deteriorated,” he said.

“More and more unions are realizing we’re living on borrowed time as far as benefits are concerned, and they’re paying a greater and greater price to keep those benefits at the bargaining table.”

Portland Jobs With Justice has thrown itself into the campaign for single payer, reaching out to other labor organizations to broaden the coalition supporting HB 3510. So far, nine Oregon unions have officially endorsed the measure — including two that represent teachers, often targeted for having Cadillac health benefits.

In January, Shapiro helped organize a highly successful conference on single payer in Portland. More than 400 people turned out for the event, which featured keynoters such as Dr. Margaret Flowers of Physicians for a National Health Program and Michigan Rep. John Conyers, one of the champions of single payer in Congress.

And on Friday, Shapiro brought a dose of fiery union rhetoric to the rally for HB 3510.

“We have the most profit-driven health care system in the world, and you see where that gets us,” he reminded the crowd as the event came to a close.

“The fact of the matter is, health care is not a commodity, it is a human right. And we are not consumers of health care, we are human beings!”

Mad as hell

Radiation oncologist Mike Huntington of Corvallis has devoted himself to health care reform since retiring in 2006. He became convinced of the need for change after seeing too many of his patients delay treatment because they lacked insurance coverage, with disastrous results.

“I saw it happen so often that it made me sick and then sad and then mad,” Huntington said.

In 2009 Huntington and fellow Corvallis physician Paul Hochfeld helped launch the Mad as Hell Doctors, an Oregon offshoot of Physicians for a National Health Program. The group mounted a cross-country tour, holding raucous single-payer rallies in more than two dozen cities en route to a demonstration on the White House lawn in a bid to influence the congressional debate on health care reform.

No trace of single payer made it into the federal health care reform law, which failed to include even the “public option” initially promoted by President Barack Obama.

But the Mad as Hell Doctors are still on the case. Last year they staged a California road trip to promote a single-payer measure in that state, and they’ve been touring Oregon for several weeks in support of the Dembrow bill.

On Friday, a white-coated contingent of Mad Docs was on hand for the Capitol rally, including Huntington.

The way he sees it, the financial logic of single payer is simply inescapable.

“Even health insurance CEOs privately say it. How can health care expenses keep increasing 25 percent a year? Eventually they’ll run out of customers,” Huntington said in an interview before the rally.

“It’s a false reality, and I’m going to stick around until the real reality is too hard to ignore.”

In it for the long haul

Betty Johnson is a battle-scarred veteran of the fight for single-payer health care in Oregon. She got involved in health care reform in 1991 through her church, and her faith continues to inform her work for the cause.

“It is a moral imperative to ensure that everyone has the health care they need,” she said.

The Corvallis resident, a widely respected leader in the state’s Health Care for All chapter, was a key player in the campaigns for SB 1066 and Measure 23 and now is pushing hard for HB 3510. In fact, she had a hand in writing all three proposals.

Johnson attended the rally, too, but before that she led a small cadre of Corvallis and Albany health care activists through the Capitol corridors on a mission to lobby as many lawmakers as possible to support HB 3510.

The group started on the House side of the building, stopping by the offices of Sara Gelser, Jim Thompson and Andy Olson before crossing over to the Senate wing in search of Frank Morse.

None of the legislators was in, so the mid-valley activists spent their time chatting up secretaries and aides, passing out copies of testimony to be given in the afternoon hearing and laying the groundwork for future meetings.

At Olson’s office, Johnson and Edie Orner, a retired schoolteacher who heads the Albany chapter of the Archimedes Movement, won a small victory: the promise of a breakfast meeting early next month.

Olson, an Albany Republican, is not known as a supporter of single payer, but he is willing to listen. Orner considers it progress.

“Everything that you do is building momentum,” she said, “and you just have to keep doing what you’re doing and hope that eventually there will be a tipping point.”

Johnson agrees. Like Dembrow, she has no expectations that 3510 will actually pass this session. And like him, she takes the long view of the fight for single payer.

The campaigns for SB 1066 in 1995 and Measure 23 in 2002, she said, started the conversation about single payer in Oregon, and Dembrow’s bill has created the opportunity to take the discussion one step further.

“The world is a different place than it was in 2002 — and I can’t help but think that it’s a different place, at least here in Oregon, in part because of what we did in 2002. We informed a lot of people,” Johnson said.

“That was a building block. This is a building block. And this campaign is not going to die.”

States Cry Foul With Health Care Mandate

States Cry Foul With Health Care Mandate

Ever wanted to know why there was so much opposition to the health care reform?  Well here it is.

It's called fraud.  Yes, contained within health care reform is also regulation.  Here is a great little rant from the State of Florida.  Why are they ranting?  It is because they are not compliant.

Florida is so bad, the U.S. Department of Justice teamed up with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Resources to establish the Health Care Fraud Enforcement Task Force (H.E.A.T.)  The worst part of the levels of health care fraud in these states that are crying the unconstitutional foul is that the levels of Medicaid fraud, once the federal moritoria on the suspension of the rules are lifted, will make Medicare pail in comparison to the ugly beast called Medicaid fraud.

U.S. DHHS OIG and DOJ Health Care Fraud Prevention Enforcement Team
The lack of Medicaid and Medicare regulation in the states will substantially cut the federal funding to their programs.  In essence, coming into federally funded, mandated compliance to end Medicaid and Medicare fraud will kill jobs because these fraud scheme, racketeering operations will be shut down.Department of Justice and Department of Health and Human Services response to Senator Grassley's inquiry on...