Conyers: Concealed Gun Carry Should Not Be Allowed Across State Lines

**Follow Us on Twitter @HouseJudDems**

For Immediate Release

Date: Tuesday, September 13, 2011 

Contact: Matthew Morgan – 202-226-5543

             

Conyers: Concealed Gun Carry Should Not Be Allowed Across State Lines

(WASHINGTON) – Today, the House Judiciary Committee’s Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security held a hearing on H.R. 822, the “National Right-to-Carry Reciprocity Act of 2011.”  The bill would override the laws of almost every state by obligating each to accept concealed handgun carry permits from every other state, even if the permit holder would not be allowed to obtain such a permit or carry a gun in the state in which he or she is traveling.  House Judiciary Committee Ranking Member John Conyers, Jr. (D-Mich.) issued the following statement in response to the hearing:

“This bill would endanger citizens in states across the country, including my home state of Michigan, because it would allow people from other states who do not meet the requirements of local laws for a concealed carry permit to carry concealed handguns,” Conyers said.  “Each state must be allowed to make critical public safety determinations like these without Congress overruling them.  For example, the chances of being murdered for African American males in Detroit between ages 15 and 24 have risen rapidly in recent years, and nationally, almost 300 African American youth aged 15 to 24 are injured by gun fire each week.  We must do more to fight violent gun crimes instead of making it easier for people to carry handguns in violation of our local laws.”

A long list of law enforcement and government associations oppose H.R. 822.  This list includes  Mayors Against Illegal Guns; the International Association of Chiefs of Police; the Major Cities Chiefs Association, which includes the Police Chiefs of 56 major U.S. cities; the Police Foundation; National Latino Peace Officers Association; and National Organization of Black Law Enforcement Executives.

###

EDITORIAL: One law for us, another for you

EDITORIAL: One law for us, another for you

California’s legislative hypocrisy a failure of democracy

The California state Senate voted 28-8 Wednesday to exempt itself from the pointless gun-control laws that apply to the rest of the populace. Legislators apparently think they alone are worthy to pack heat on the streets for personal protection, and the masses ought to wait until the police arrive.

This is just one of many bills Golden State politicians used this legislative session to set themselves apart from the little people, the ones who pay their inflated salaries. Annual compensation for legislators averages about $140,000, not counting luxurious perks such as taxpayer-funded cars and free gasoline. By comparison, the average Californian earns $50,000 a year, and the unemployment rate is 11.9 percent - far above the national average. Exact salaries for state assemblymen and senators are obscured by the use of a “per diem” payment scheme that shelters a significant chunk of income from taxation.

Attempts by a handful of reformers to require politicians to provide a full annual disclosure of the benefits received from the public treasury have been rebuffed. Currently, government officials must file a statement of economic interests revealing income from any source other than a local, state or federal government agency. Gifts worth more than $50 also must be disclosed, but lawmakers rejected a bill that would have prohibited acceptance of concert and sporting event tickets, gift cards, spa treatments, golf outings and other benefits from lobbyists trying to buy votes.

Bills of this nature never meet an honest fate in which roll-call votes put members on the record as favoring or opposing each idea. Instead, reform measures are held in committee to die quietly as legislative deadlines pass. As of last week, it’s effectively impossible for a bill to become law if it hasn’t already passed in at least one of the chambers.

Such a silent death sentence was imposed on a bill that would have eliminated the practice of allowing select public employees to avoid paying red-light-camera tickets and escape any consequence for using toll roads without paying. The current system grants free rides to politicians, court workers, police officers, city council members, social workers, meter maids and their spouses. The bill failed even after a compromise amendment deleted the requirement to pay red-light-camera tickets.

The arrogance of the political class is certainly not limited to California. Federal law prohibits private companies from pestering the public with unwanted telemarketing calls from businesses, but Congress exempted “political organizations” - i.e., themselves - from its provisions. In Sacramento, an attempt failed to establish a special Do Not Call list for people who don’t want to listen to automated calls from California pols.

Left coast politicians lack all shame regarding their self-enrichment at public expense. Even though their outrageous conduct has sunk a once-prosperous state $10 billion in debt, the public seems not to care. In November, voters recycled Jerry Brown as governor even though Gov. Moonbeam’s disastrous tenure during the 1970s enabled the compensation packages for a unionized public sector that are busting the budget today. When California finally goes bankrupt, voters need only look in the mirror when wondering who deserves the blame.

JUST SAY NO TO GUN CONTROL.

JUST SAY NO TO GUN CONTROL. 

Top Democratic lawmakers are becoming convinced thatTexas Rep. Lamar Smith, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, is not likely to allow any kind of gun control legislation to emerge from his panel. Speaking at the National Press Club, Rep. John Conyers, D-Mich., the committee’s top Democrat, said it will be “very difficult” for gun-control backers to achieve any success this year.

Conyers told the NPC newsmaker event that “negotiations are still going on” with Smith about scheduling hearings on gun control during this year. Smith rejected out of hand a request by Judiciary Democrats to convene public hearings after the January assassination attempt againstRep. Gabrielle Giffords, D-Ariz. More on CQ.com>>>